Learning Problem
Students employ a memorised recipe approach when solving mathematics tutorial
problems and see these problems as being disconnected from their desired fields
of study. Especially relevant at 1st year level.
Educational Goals
- Facilitate conceptual understanding and applicability of content
- Use relevance to motivate
- Use the idea of the student as a producer to motivate
- Developing a reflective practitioner approach
Task.
Collaborative learning is a powerful knowledge building tool
in mathematics. This can be leveraged
via an online system to develop a deeper understanding of the content and employing
real world tutorial problems can address the issues of relevance and hence
motivation. The students (in groups) develop
the solution over time by editing and expanding the current work. They will be required to clearly explain the
underlying concepts and explore a computational solution.
Table 1: Affordances required by the task
Affordances
|
Required
|
Read-ability
|
√
|
View-ability
|
√
|
Listen-ability
|
|
Watch-ability
|
√
|
Write-ability
|
√
|
Edit-ability
|
√
|
MathW-ability
|
√
|
Draw-ability
|
√
|
Speak-ability
|
|
Video-produce-ability
|
|
Resize-ability
|
√
|
Move-ability
|
√
|
Playback-ability
|
√
|
Accessibility
|
√
|
Record ability
|
√
|
Synchronous-ability
|
|
Browse-ability
|
√
|
Search-ability
|
√
|
Data-manipulation-ability
|
|
Link-ability
|
√
|
Highlight-ability
|
|
Focus ability
|
|
Permission-ability
|
√
|
Share-ability
|
√
|
Note: Had to add MathW due to unique nature of maths language.
Have also added edit-ability as we require a current version but with the ability to change or view previous versions (not in sequential form)
Have also added edit-ability as we require a current version but with the ability to change or view previous versions (not in sequential form)
Table 2: Affordances of Tools vs Task
Affordances
|
Blog
|
Chat
|
Forum
|
Wiki
|
Task
|
Read-ability
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
View-ability
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
|
Listen-ability
|
|||||
Watch-ability
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
|
Write-ability
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
Edit-ability
|
√
|
√
|
|||
MathW-ability
|
√
|
√
|
|||
Draw-ability
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
|
Speak-ability
|
|||||
Video-produce-ability
|
|||||
Resize-ability
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
||
Move-ability
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
||
Playback-ability
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
Accessibility
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
Record ability
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
Synchronous-ability
|
√
|
||||
Browse-ability
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
Search-ability
|
|||||
Data-manipulation-ability
|
|||||
Link-ability
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
|
Highlight-ability
|
|||||
Focus ability
|
|||||
Permission-ability
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
Share-ability
|
√
|
√
|
√
|
Note: Not all wikis are the same. In terms of this prototype ability to handle maths is crucial. Need to explore more.
Need to explore affordances of other tools in more detail
Need to explore affordances of other tools in more detail
Theoretical Basis
- Problems in maths at 1st year level - Engelbrecht et al
- Idea of collaborative learning for constructing knowledge – Johnson and Johnson 1996 (collab)
- Increase depth of understanding using collaborative learning - Cohen et al (1989)
- Online Collaborative learning - Curtis and Lawson 2001
- Increased motivation - Pfaff and Huddleston 2003
- Using wikis - Augar, Ruth, Zhou (conf proc), Ben-Zvi (2007), Martin and Premadasa (2010)
- Digital fluency - Bologa, Lupu, Sabau (2007), 21st Century Information Fluency Project, Kaminski, Switzer, Gloeckner (2009)
General Contexts
- Applied in no tech tutorial session in science and engineering
- Applied in computer rich tutorial environment (SCALE-UP)
- Applied in asynchronous digital environment in maths
- Not useful when simple drill work is required.
- Have personally used low tech collaborative learning in 1st year physics in ECP programme, 4th year conceptual modern physics and HP Tablet project with ECP students.
UCT Context
1st year maths AD maths with ~150 per class
Mainly non English first language students
Science Careers
Asynchronous collaborative work is ideal as it provides
students with the space to think before re-engaging with the content and peers. Also promotes sharing and informal peer
review.
Challenges
- Assessment - how when????
- Scaffolding - enough but not too little
- Digital fluency. Interventions?
- Digital access
- Tutorial development - Loads of work but MAA publication might make things easier. NRF funding to visit industries/companies to develop material
- Team issues - loafing, conflict etc.
- Drill work vs authentic problems
- Will most likely need glossary component as well
wow, Ian! excellent work! I can see you have put a lot of thought into this...have you done all this work over the last couple of weeks or have you thought about this for a longer period of time? it sound potentially very exciting...my only worry would be to get students to engage on the wiki...how will they take ownership of this tool? what will motivate them to take part (apart from marks?), how will you facilitate this process? especially since you are not teaching these students directly...are you sure your Math colleague is on board? as comfortable with wikis as you are? i think those will be crucial questions in all this...i really like your model to evaluate different tools along affordances for a specific project...
ReplyDelete